AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Dis argus east2/29/2024 ![]() ![]() Our pickup and delivery services that functioning in every port of loadingĬountry provide our customers an easy hand to collect the shipments from various parts of the sourcing country and bring it to their store. Our per CARTON/per CBM door to door console movements from China, India, Turkey and other all middle east countries is a client friendly model special for the clients who dealing small volume of shipments. ARGUS’s experienced staff handles everything from loading, to deliveringĪt your doorstep and in between keeping you updated about the status of the shipment. With ARGUS handling your cargo, you need not worry about loading, unloading at the port, storage or road transport to reaching the final destination at your doorstep. Our customer satisfaction gives us the pleasure to take adequate care in the process of delivering theĬontainer to the client at his doorstep. 30 at the Pro Bowl football game, there were some players in white jerseys who had their arms crossed in front of their chest.ARGUS SHIPPING’s rich experience and the expertise helps clients with the most extensive and convenient logistics services with the unique door-to-door delivery service. Supreme Court justices are subject to the rule of law. Even stricter penalties are also a possibility - at least if one believes that even U.S. Code, including as much as a $50,000 fine and up to one year imprisonment, or both, for each violation of the federal law. According to the statute clearly printed on the disclosure reports filed by Thomas, just below his signature on each, the Supreme Court Justice could be held accountable for his omissions by penalties under the U.S. Moreover, Thomas’ “inadvertent omissions,” as he describes them now, appear to be in violation of U.S. In short, these organizations stood to make millions based on the decision in the case, in which Thomas supported the majority decision. Federal Election Commission, which had a very direct impact on the fundraising ability of organizations such as The Heritage Foundation. Virginia Thomas’ income from The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think-tank, totaling $686,589 from 2003 to 2007, was omitted from the forms entirely.Īdditional disclosures reveal that Thomas withheld such information for as many as 20 years, even while he was deciding cases such as Citizens United v. SUPREME Court Justice Clarence Thomas likely violated federal law by failing to report his wife’s salary by checking “none” on the box for “Non-Investment Income” on judicial Financial Disclosure Reports for the last 20 years. Perhaps when this severe winter is over, Gore will come out of hibernation.įinally, I am reminded of a scene in the movie “The Wizard of Oz,” when the veil was removed and we saw the wizard for what he really was. Further, those of us who do not believe or follow them are considered to be worthy of ridicule and scorn. They both have a charismatic leader and ardent followers. I see a similarity to this movement and man-made religions. I AM so grateful for the freedom of the press because I can express my opinion on matters like global warming and Al Gore. 10, to learn more about the proposed rates and to provide comments to the board. We invite any interested customers to attend our public rate hearing at ACWD headquarters, 43885 South Grimmer Blvd., at 6 p.m. The ACWD board and employees are keenly aware of our responsibility to use ratepayers’ funds wisely and in ways that will allow us to continue to deliver the high quality water and service our customers have come to expect. The letter also asserts that reasons for the proposed rate increase include -… 20 percent more for employee pensions.” In fact, no pension increases for ACWD employees are planned. ![]() With the proposed increase in the bimonthly service charge to $12.55, ACWD would continue to rank among the lowest in the Bay Area for service charges (and for overall water rates). The author characterized the existing $11.62 bimonthly service charge as “exorbitant.” Actually, ACWD’s existing service charge for most residential customers is the fifth lowest among our 30 comparable agencies in the Bay Area. Unfortunately, the letter contained factual errors that need to be corrected. 27 urged Argus readers to protest Alameda County Water District’s (ACWD) proposed 8 percent rate increase.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |