AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Judith butler terf2/28/2024 Hence, Butler's position is at once pro-trans and contra-trans. In some ways, that's a political act of rebellion because you defy who can act male or female. since all there is are acts and behaviors disconnected from biology, everybody in society is acting out a role, which means that all there is are roles, and therefore nothing prevents you from picking up a different role. In political terms, transgender women are in truth very conservative because their actions uphold a system that oppress women.Īt the same time, because Butler insists that gender is performance, there is nothing preventing a male body to act female. We could say that while the goal of feminism is to say that "woman" is not defined by what men think, and that one can be a woman in a million ways, transgender women reductive chose to replicate a pernicious understanding of womanhood. defining what "woman" and "acting like a woman" mean in terms of how empowered male structures have defined it. Ideally, we'd eliminate gender roles entirely and let there only be "human" as a single role, with children being equally loved by both parents regardless of their gender identity/apparent sex.įrom Butler's position transgender people replicate modes of oppression by e.g. Gender role is entirely performative, except for ability to fulfil certain "duties" of a role. Gender expressions should ideally be decoupled from apparent sex, and people should be free to act and behave in ways that suit their personalities without having to transition medically. Gender expression is entirely societal, beyond certain personality traits that endocrine systems encourage/discourage. However, regardless of culture, I will still suffer from dysphoria and will still seek medical solutions to my genetics clashing with my brain's expectations. In cultures with more than just 2 genders, descriptors other than "woman" might be suitable. This collection of expectations are best defined by the concept of "female person" in western culture. My brain, for instance, expects my endocrine system to be that of a typical XX chromosome individual, my reproductive capabilities to be around being able to give birth, and my body to have developed as if it was doused in estradiol through puberty (voice, breasts, skeltal/muscular structure, fat deposits). Meaning, the expectations the brain has for the body to develop in a certain way, for chemicals (hormones) to be of certain concentrations, for specific traits to manifest and for reproductive capability. Is most likely defined by the brain's concept of body image. Instead, gender should be considered the composite of various things - gender identity/neurological gender, gender role and gender expression. Gender being treated as a single, monolithic concept does not truly represent reality. I would say that Butler believes we won't find a gender identity underneath the performative femininity and masculinity, but honestly, we're all just guessing. It's my personal belief that once we deconstruct that, we'll still find gender identity alive and well underneath it, but the way we understand it will be very different to the way we understand our gender identities currently. What Butler is talking about is what I would refer to as femininity and masculinity, both of which are constructed, performative and correlate with gender thanks to social pressures, and I agree with her completely. I would argue that we're conflating terms and ideas here. Is the concept generally looked at in a positive light as "your gender is based off of what you do, so do what you want"? She ripped apart the journalist who interviewed her for Newstateman and tried to lead her down the path of supporting TERF talking points. Butler is an amazing ally that has zero time for TERFS and their bullshit! Judith Butler on the culture wars, JK Rowling and living in “anti-intellectual times” ().
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |